Open Discussion Ethical Due Diligence
Patrick Dunne, Group Communications Director, 3i
In his talk, Patrick Dunne explained why in 3i corporate
responsibility forms an important part of their commercial
due diligence. A publicly listed private equity company,
3i has corporate responsibility policies in place, both
for the corporation itself and for their investment
activities. The company's CR report and policies are
regarded as sales tools, as sound corporate responsibility
standards will improve the sustainability and long-term
prospects of a business.
Corporate responsibility considerations play a role
both during the pre-investment phase and in portfolio
management. 3i's commercial due diligence into potential
investment targets includes an assessment of ethical
risks and opportunities. They also seek to ensure that
they work with people who have high ethical and professional
standards and sensitivity for potential ethical risks.
3i requires the companies they own to comply with local
regulation or to adopt higher standards (e.g. regarding
child labour, health & safety). This is particularly
important if the company is subsequently to be sold
to a globally operating business. 3i also seeks to resolve
any arising responsibility issues, knowing that a good
CR record will help to sell the company. As an example,
the speaker mentioned that in one case a major part
of the value creation from particular chemical company
was the opportunity to transform it to meet higher environmental
standards. Furthermore, engagement with employees and
trade unions where relevant is considered key to successful
private equity projects. Finally, when companies are
sold back into the market, 3i does not always accept
the highest bidder, as the quality of the organisation
or person purchasing is important.
The speaker said that with every investment project
it is important to have a clear purpose, and the right
people and processes in place. Value creation takes
place primarily through earnings growth, not financial
engineering. However, the communication of the importance
of CR for the long-term viability of the businesses
remains an on-going challenge.
Discussion topics included:
What happens when things goes wrong
Private Equity in China
Relevant indicators in Ethical Due Diligence exercises
Thursday
7th February
Business
Ethics Net Handling Ethical Breaches
Thursday
28th February
Speaker Lunch How Imperial Tobacco approaches stewardship
Ian Bailey, Head of Science & Stewardship, Imperial
Tobacco
The speaker set out how his organisation, a globally
operating tobacco company, seeks to ensure it lives
up to high standards of corporate responsibility. He
explained that in the context of Imperial Tobacco stewardship
means 1) discharge of legal responsibilities which any
manufacturer has under UK case law ("Duty of care")
and 2) behaviour consistent with ethical systems and
standards.
In addition to compliance with existing legislation
and regulation, manufacturers are required to take reasonable
care in the design and manufacture of their products.
They are expected to keep themselves informed about
the product and its reported effects and to respond
to new information. Imperial Tobacco meets these requirements
by, for example, having stewardship processes for ingredients
and 'contact' materials in place, by pursuing a quality
driven management approach (ISO 9000 and 14001) and
by promoting good agricultural practice among their
leaf growers. Their research and development department
creates internal understanding of the product, for example,
by carrying out toxicology assessments and testing of
ingredients and emissions. Furthermore, they review
relevant scientific literature, attend conferences and
engage with independent experts. Imperial Tobacco also
seeks to develop new products that may prove to be less
harmful to the consumer.
The speaker argued that more formal ethical analysis
is needed both in business and civil society. He referred
to four ethical theories that could be used for such
analysis: deontology, consequentialism, post-modern
ethics, and virtue / value ethics. All of these approaches
should be used together, otherwise only partial solutions
to ethical problems will be found.
Ian Bailey mentioned a number of ethical instruments
that are used within Imperial Tobacco: a values statement
that sets out actions the company will do, a set of
business principles, and group-wide policies and standards.
Education and persuasion is preferred to a coercive
approach to changing behaviours. Imperial Tobacco sets
itself high expectations with regards to responsible
behaviour. These include an international marketing
standard, environmental stewardship, enlightened employment
practices (compliance with ILO core conventions), elimination
of smuggling and counterfeit and community investment
and capability building.
Discussion topics included:
the benefits of a principles-based marketing code
of practice
board sensitivity to ethical issues
ethical decision-making in business
the value of the 'business case'
Monday
3rd March
Ethics in the Workplace The Good Employer
Mike Emmott, Chartered Institute of Personnel &
Development
Mike Emmott began by looking at what is meant by the
idea of a 'good employer'. He discussed concepts of
paternalism, fair pay and conditions, and job security.
Employee satisfaction was another measure frequently
used in employee attitude surveys. But, along with other
examples, Mike suggested that 'good work' was essentially
'well-managed work'. The People and Performance model,
developed by Prof John Purcell, shows that HR practices
are mediated by line managers; if managers do their
job well, employees will do their best for the organisation.
Their 'discretionary behaviour' gives fulfilment to
staff and enhances performance.
Mike outlined the elements of the psychological contract
and talked through a model drawn up through CIPD research
on how to manage it. The main elements of the psychological
contract are trust, fairness and 'delivery of the deal'
ie. employers doing what the employee expects of them
and vice versa. The key element underpinning a positive
employment relationship as well as an ethical framework,
is trust. Employers' interest in corporate social responsibility
means that employees are increasingly seen as stakeholders.
The following issues were raised in discussion -
Engaging employees and seeing them as a key relationship
The importance of front line managers in raising
levels of of employee engagement
The rights of agency workers
The psychological contract across the generations
The importance of respect to individuals, no matter
what their job
The difficulty of marrying the requirements of staff
for work/home balance and the demands of clients for
24 hour contact.
Thursday
6th March
Publication Launch Use of Codes of Ethics in Business: 2007 survey &
analysis of trends by Simon Webley with Nicole Dando, Niall Gallagher
& Lutz Preuss.
Jenny Dawkins, Head of Corporate Responsibility Research
at Ipsos MORI Reputation Centre provided some context
for the IBE's Use of Codes of Business Ethics Survey.
Using a number of surveys, she showed how consumer views
of business has changed and profit is no longer enough
to legitimise a company's role in society.
Stakeholders have high expectations of companies and
do not feel they are living up to them. Integrity and
honesty of companies are the key things which consumers
judge companies on, yet there is still a trust gap between
what the public expect and how they perceive business
behaviour.
Simon Webley, IBE Research Director, the author of the
report, then described the main findings and the principal
results of the fifth IBE survey of FTSE350 companies
on how they use and implement their codes of ethics.
The Institute has been conducting this survey since
1995 and so can trace trends and changes in the way
companies use their codes of ethics to embed their values
within company culture. (see here
>> for more information about the report).
Nicole Dando, Head of Projects at IBE and author of
a chapter of the report, then spoke about the findings
of the survey with regards to how companies deal with
climate change in their codes of ethics.
Discussion topics included:
The mismatch between what concerns companies and
what concerns the general public
Ethical assurance - companies measuring their performance
against their own ethical values
Cost of investment in business ethics.
Bonus structures to reward long-term thinking rather
than short term profits.
Values-based versus compliance-based codes.
The role of leaders in setting the cultural tone
of an organisation from the top
Thursday
13th March
Roundtable Promoting Integrity in Reporting
Anne Davis, Institute of Chartered Accountants in England
& Wales
Calls for a renewal of integrity in business reporting
are common whenever there is a lack of public confidence
in business. An IBE survey conducted by Ipsos-MORI shows
that the public believe that business is behaving less
ethically that a year ago (54% compared to 58% in 2006).
Mistrust in business leads to calls for greater regulation
What can be done to enhance the standards of corporate
reporting?
What is meant by integrity in business reporting?
Why is integrity in business reporting important?
How can reporting inspire trust and confidence?
How does an organisation achieve the consistency
and openness required for reporting with integrity?
Anne Davis, Ethics Manager, at the ICAEW will introduce
the discussion at a corporate subscriber only roundtable
on the subject of promoting integrity in reporting on
Thursday 13th March . Her responsibilities include the
ICAEW's Code of Ethics and consultations/representations
to regulators and other bodies on ethics related matters.
Anne is principal author of the ICAEW's Reporting with
Integrity publication.
Thursday
17th April
Speaker Lunch Tackling corruption: Anglo American and the EITI
Edward Bickham, Executive Vice President, External Affairs
Anglo American
The speaker first outlined his organisation's anti-corruption
policies and then explained more about the Extractive
Industry Transparency Initiative (EITI), on the Board
of which he serves and in which Anglo American is an
active participant.
A globally operating mining company, Anglo American
has developed a range of standards and tools designed
to combat bribery and corruption. In their Business
Principles, they set out their position on corruption:
'We are implacably opposed to corruption. We will not
offer, pay or accept bribes.' Furthermore, the company
has a policy of making no political donations and they
seek to avoid any misuse of social investment funds
for political ends. Anglo American also seeks to promote
the application of their Business Principles to their
business partners and in their joint ventures.
The company has a range of mechanisms in place designed
to ensure compliance with their anti-corruption policy.
As part of an Annual Letter of Assurance, Business Unit
CEOs are required to confirm compliance with the Business
Principles including the anti-corruption policy and
to explain in which circumstances they may have encountered
attempts to solicit bribes and how they dealt with it.
External assurance processes and the company's Integrated
Risk Management Process also consider bribery and corruption.
Furthermore, Anglo American provides a well-used global
'speak-up' facility to their employees. On-line training
modules are also being developed to provide more guidance
to staff on this issue.
The context of the EITI is the highly specific nature
of the extractive sector. Extractive projects are characterised
by long-term investment horizons and immobile (geologically
defined) assets. As such, they have a strong interest
in good governance and stability. On the other hand,
there are concerns around how the revenues that extractive
companies generate are being used by host governments.
Will they be used to further the country's socio-economic
development or will they serve only to enrich the country's
elite? Extractive operations also pose a number of macro-economic
challenges. For example, as an export-oriented industry
they can significantly influence the host country's
exchange rate of currency and may 'crowd-out' other
sectors; moreover, the volatility of commodity prices
may lead governments to over-extend their public expenditure
during boom times, leading to debt during downturns.
The EITI was set up in 2002 as multi-stakeholder initiative
to improve governance in resource-dependent countries.
Oil, gas and mining companies declare all their tax
and royalty payments, whereas host governments declare
receipts. The benefits of this initiative include capacity
building, greater transparency and protection against
embezzlement by elites.
The EITI is governed by an international board comprising
representatives of implementing countries, supporting
countries, NGOs, oil/gas and mining companies, investors
and international financial institutions (observers).
The implementation of the EITI is a country-led process;
each country decides which stakeholders will be involved.
No country has been verified for compliance yet but
there are more than 20 candidate countries.
The EITI is seeking to extend its scope. In future,
it will aim to improve the transparency of sub-national
revenue flows. The EITI++ project, being proposed by
the World Bank, on the other hand, will focus on "the
entire chain of managing natural resources - from awarding
contracts, monitoring operations to collecting taxes,
to improving resource extraction and economic management"
(http://eitransparency.org/). Finally, EITI's approach
may also spread to other sectors with government rent.
Discussion topics included:
Challenges around the multi-stakeholder approach
Possible involvement of the BRIC countries in EITI
Challenge of extending business principles to join-ventures
Monday
21 April
Open Discussion Ethics & Ageism Rachel Krys, Employers Forum on Age
Age discrimination in employment is now unlawful.
But like most laws designed to combat discrimination
and promote equality, there are many grey areas and
much debate about what this really means, both for employers
and employees.
What are the ethical issues surrounding ageism in
the workplace?
What impacts does the new legislation have on the
workplace?
How are decisions about recruitment, redundancy
and retirement affected?
How can employers fairly reward loyalty and performance?
Why is age an issue?
Rachel Krys is the Director of the Employers Forum
on Age (EFA), the UK's leading authority on age. Founded
in 1996 the EFA is an independent network of leading
employers who recognise the value of an age diverse
workforce.
Rachel will examine these questions which will then
be followed by an open discussion under the Chatham
House Rule. The event will take place at 24 Greencoat
Place, London SW1P 1BE starting at 3pm. The event will
close at 5.00pm.
Thursday
1 May
Business
Ethics Net meeting
Thursday
8th May
Ethics in the Workplace
Crisis Management: Preparation - the Key to Avoiding
Negligence
Dom Chester, Senior Consultant, Crisis Management and
Business Continuity, Control Risks
This talk focused on companies' duty of care in relation
to crisis management. Drawing from a case study in which
he had been involved as a consultant, Dom Chester highlighted
a number of issues that may arise if organisations are
not sufficiently prepared for a crisis. The case study
was about the evacuation of employees from Lebanon during
the military conflict between the Hezbollah and Israel
in 2006. Issues that emerged during the evacuation included
companies' failure to have a contingency plan in place,
confusion over ownership of the problem (i.e. which
corporate function or department should be responsible),
over-reliance on the relevant authorities, lack of understanding
over time required, and poor communication.
The speaker said that there are three phases to every
crisis: Before (the preparation phase), During (reaction
and response) and After (review and realign). Particularly
focusing on the preparation phase, he emphasised how
crucial it was for a company to develop and maintain
capability and to provide adequate training. Important
aspects of crisis capability include
having a dedicated team in place,
being clear about what needs protecting (people,
finance, assets etc),
up-to-date contingency plans and provision of adequate
training to people who will use them,
having appropriate communication channels in place,
provision of an adequate forum for team members
to meet and communicate,
relevant experience (including experience from scenario
exercises).
In the final part of his talk, Dom Chester explained
some provisions of the 2007 Corporate Manslaughter Act
and how they affect corporate duty of care.
Discussion topics included:
importance of worst-case-scenario training
who in the company should be trained
levels of risk assessment
importance of stakeholder perception of how a company
responds to a crisis
challenge of providing appropriate support to different
kinds of employees in the event of a crisis (e.g.
expats vs local workers)
how crisis evaluation can lead to a review of other
corporate policies (e.g. policies on home working)